From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 30 15:56:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9032C5B for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 15:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 968722178 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 15:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBUFuBHm004731 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:56:12 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id sBUFuBZh004728; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:56:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:56:11 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Christian Baer Subject: Re: FreeBSD with Win7 and UEFI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20141226072950.GB13694@kontrol.kode5.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:56:12 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 15:56:14 -0000 On Tue, 30 Dec 2014, Christian Baer wrote: > Am 28.12.2014 um 20:40 schrieb Warren Block: > >> UEFI is a whole new game, utterly different from what came before. And >> FreeBSD's UEFI support is new. As far as I know, it has no provision >> for multibooting in UEFI. Code to do that would be welcome, it's been >> difficult just to get the current UEFI support. > > Yes, I've read about that and the fact that it has been quite hard. This > actually did surprise me a bit, considering that UEFI has been around for a > while now. > >> Your boot menu suggests that Windows 7 is installed for standard BIOS >> booting. > > This sentence actually rather suggests that you have not read my post > (properly) before answering. Your boot menu pointed out that FreeBSD was EFI and did not do that for Windows. Also, Windows 7 UEFI installs are rare. > Why would you therefore assume I have installed an EFI FreeBSD on an BIOS > system? I have never tried that, so I don't know if that would even work. Some UEFI systems can attempt legacy BIOS booting and then UEFI, and it appeared that Windows 7 was booting in BIOS mode while FreeBSD was installed for UEFI.