From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jun  2 18:54:05 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA26855
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 18:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA26850
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 18:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA04013;
	Mon, 2 Jun 1997 18:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706030155.SAA04013@implode.root.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: vm problems on 2.2, 2.1.7 works 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Jun 1997 21:11:46 EDT."
             <9706030111.AA01950@mlor.its.rpi.edu> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 1997 18:55:35 -0700
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>Does INND call fork() for some of it's processing?
>
>If so, this sounds somewhat similar to a vm problem that exists
>in NeXTSTEP, and which (IIRC) used to exist in FreeBSD, but had
>been fixed earlier.  It might have been in one of the other BSD
>variants, though.

   This was one of the first VM problems that we fixed in FreeBSD.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project