From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jun 20 15:32:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF65337B404 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 15:32:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 9DD795362; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 00:32:27 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "Sam Leffler" Cc: Subject: Re: DIAGNOSTIC vs. INVARIANTS References: <124a01c2189b$72df9cd0$52557f42@errno.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 21 Jun 2002 00:32:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <124a01c2189b$72df9cd0$52557f42@errno.com> Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Sam Leffler" writes: > I read DIAGNOSTIC to be intended to control inclusion of code that _prints > diagnostic messages_ or similar and not code that does consistency checks. DIAGNOSTICS is also intended for consistency checks that have a significant impact on performance. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message