Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:49:04 +0100
From:      Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
To:        Isaac Grover <isaac.grover@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: xdelta 1.1.4 issues
Message-ID:  <48A518D0.3000901@infracaninophile.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <bf7af5e50808141945l7445c258g624f1a4eab46a75b@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <bf7af5e50808141945l7445c258g624f1a4eab46a75b@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig31403B59818BBE62326DD96E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Isaac Grover wrote:
> Good evening from Wisconsin,

Good morning from Kent
=20
> This post is regarding the xdelta-1.1.3 port included in FreeBSD
> 6.2-RELEASE.  Please direct me to the proper mailing list if this is
> not where I should be posting.

No -- this is the correct mailing list for discussing all things ports
related. You might want to try contacting the port maintainer though --
to find the maintainer:

   % cd /usr/ports/misc/xdelta
   % make maintainer

> I am attempting to use xdelta on tar files currently just over 8.2GB.
> My syntax to get the delta is "xdelta delta oldtarfile newtarfile
> patchfile" according to the man page.  When the patchfile has been
> created, it is around 5.3MB in size.  To verify the patchfile, using
> "xdelta patch patchfile oldtarfile newtarfiletest" yield a
> newtarfiletest of 465MB.  Available space shouldn't be an issue, as I
> have 22GB available on this partition.

> Could anyone here provide some insight as to why this xdelta port
> isn't functioning as advertised?

One possibility is that this is related to the size of the files
you're dealing with.  Does xdelta function correctly for
smaller tarballs?  Is this on a 32 or a 64 bit system?

Could you try the misc/xdelta3 port which contains version 3.0t --=20
a late beta test version but pretty stable?

If this is a problem that you need a fast work-around to, check
out http://www.daemonology.net/bsdiff/ -- written by the chap who is=20
currently FreeBSD security officer, and part of the base system
in FreeBSD.  See bsdiff(1) and bspatch(1).

	Cheers,

	Matthew

--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                   7 Priory Courtyard
                                                  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey     Ramsgate
                                                  Kent, CT11 9PW


--------------enig31403B59818BBE62326DD96E
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREIAAYFAkilGNcACgkQ8Mjk52CukIz8ggCeOG7GnXeYs146wAwAjON5ZSa6
DD8AoJNPIQbfLaWmBZXgP79ZM5imkPaN
=+7LN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig31403B59818BBE62326DD96E--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48A518D0.3000901>