From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 13:25:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DE116A4BF for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:25:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spork.pantherdragon.org (spork.pantherdragon.org [206.29.168.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697BA43FA3 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:25:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmp@bitfreak.org) Received: from speck.techno.pagans (12-206-23-247.client.attbi.com [12.206.23.247]) by spork.pantherdragon.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DDD2A41F; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from speck.techno.pagans (localhost.techno.pagans [127.0.0.1]) by speck.techno.pagans (Postfix) with SMTP id C2CE7C0D0; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:24:57 -0700 From: Darren Pilgrim To: Brett Glass Message-Id: <20030903132457.3602c35e.dmp@bitfreak.org> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20030903131429.03609c60@localhost> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030902180402.028e2380@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030901143026.029afce0@localhost> <1062427379.15322.12.camel@suzy.unbreakable.homeunix.org> <29508631.20030901165843@mail.ru> <1062427379.15322.12.camel@suzy.unbreakable.homeunix.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20030901143026.029afce0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030902180402.028e2380@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030903131429.03609c60@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: sub_0@netcabo.pt cc: Diego Calleja =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Garc=EDa?= cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ugly Huge BSD Monster X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 20:25:07 -0000 On 2003.09.03 13:19:39 -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > So, you're suggesting that FreeBSD users put up with > incompatibilities, glitches, and an unethical licensing regime merely > because they can get something that KINDA works today? This is very > shortsighted. Why not just go with Windows? It has all of the same > attributes. You've said that KDE is only partially function under FreeBSD more than once now. Would you please elaborate on this? I use FreeBSD+KDE as my desktop and, short of a more complete Windows emulator, I haven't found anything I could do in Windows or Linux that I can't do in FreeBSD+KDE.