Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 17:47:32 +0300 From: Dmitry Sivachenko <trtrmitya@gmail.com> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Bart=C5=82omiej_Rutkowski?= <robak@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r415588 - head/devel/etcd Message-ID: <BCA85638-599A-4A71-BB5D-8AFF9F58ECE2@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <C5DE70F1580914D82266D088@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <201605210959.u4L9xvbg085845@repo.freebsd.org> <B161E6FDA7F4F815A9F4D61A@atuin.in.mat.cc> <2A0B44CD-F5CA-4C72-A980-66A661EE463D@FreeBSD.org> <C5DE70F1580914D82266D088@atuin.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 21 May 2016, at 17:22, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > +--On 21 mai 2016 11:33:51 +0100 Bart=C5=82omiej Rutkowski = <robak@FreeBSD.org> > wrote: > |=20 > |> On 21 May 2016, at 11:29, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > |>=20 > |> +--On 21 mai 2016 09:59:57 +0000 Bartek Rutkowski = <robak@FreeBSD.org> > |> wrote: > |> | @@ -1,3 +1,2 @@ > |> | -TIMESTAMP =3D 1463262689 > |> | -SHA256 (coreos-etcd-v2.3.4_GH0.tar.gz) =3D > |> | c08f68c3d21929ed3683fe94acefcd871bb3c4339117e745033bf2fb990966a9 = -SIZE > |> | (coreos-etcd-v2.3.4_GH0.tar.gz) =3D 2208416 > |> | +SHA256 (coreos-etcd-v2.3.5_GH0.tar.gz) =3D > |> | a20f73c81c5fac6e99a69e7629a3b89857a5bc5b4b24075b9191194b64a8d49c = +SIZE > |> | (coreos-etcd-v2.3.5_GH0.tar.gz) =3D 2208972 > |>=20 > |> I'm sorry, but why was the TIMESTAMP line removed instead of being > |> updated ? > |>=20 > |> -- > |> Mathieu Arnold > |=20 > | I havent seen any announcement about this TIMESTAMP thing, nor there = is > | any information in the UPDATING, so I thought its some half-baked > | work-in-progress, therefore I am removing it from my distfiles, when = it > | sneaks in. Note, I am not doing it as any form of 'disagreement' or > | having anything against it, but simply due to lack of any = information > | what that thing is. >=20 > Please, keep the TIMESTAMP line in the distinfo files of your ports, = of all > ports. There has not been an announcement, yes, but the code is = staying, > because it is needed, as is the line. >=20 The usual procedure is running 'make makesum'. Since it does include = TIMESTAMP, I do not understand what is the reason of manually modifying = distinfo, even if new field appeared without announcement.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BCA85638-599A-4A71-BB5D-8AFF9F58ECE2>