From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Dec  4 16:48:33 2000
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec  4 16:48:30 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail2.uniserve.com (mail2.uniserve.com [204.244.156.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D29837B401
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon,  4 Dec 2000 16:48:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell.uniserve.ca ([204.244.186.218])
	by mail2.uniserve.com with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1)
	id 1436HL-000MnV-00; Mon, 04 Dec 2000 16:48:20 -0800
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 16:48:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com>
X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca
To: thomas@hentschel.net
Cc: Noor Dawod <noor@comrax.com>,
	FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Xeon 
In-Reply-To: <200012042344.eB4NiKr96213@falcon.home.hentschel.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10012041647080.13847-100000@shell.uniserve.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 thomas@hentschel.net wrote:

> On  4 Dec, Tom wrote:
> > 
> [snip]
> > 
> >   I find it strange that lots of people are trying (booting) FreeBSD on
> > large x86 SMP systems, but no one seems to be using them in production.
>  
> not true :

  I'm thinking large as greater than 4 CPUs.



Tom
Uniserve



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message