From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul 14 08:30:29 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C5A37B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 08:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11D1C43FE0
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 08:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 17083 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Jul 2003 15:29:42 -0000
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 08:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030714142101.GA1706@laptop.6bone.nl>
Message-ID: <20030714082907.A17077@root.org>
References: <20030713161722.Y15284@root.org>
	<20030714142101.GA1706@laptop.6bone.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADSUP: acpica 0619 in the tree
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:30:30 -0000

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 04:18:52PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > I have imported acpica 0619.  I will be gone for a few hours but will be
> > checking again tonight in case there are any problems.
>
> I wasn't able to test the update before it was committed, but it doesn't
> have any runtime regressions for me so far, so that's good!
>
> However, something I haven't seen reported before, is that it breaks for
> the ACPI_DEBUG case. (Which I have in /etc/make.conf)
>
> The first thing to do is to add the new file dmobject.c to the debugging
> section in the modules/acpi/Makefile.
> However, there are some more hairy things that prevent it from simply just
> working that I am looking into now.

Yes, thanks for pointing that out.  The whole debug level/layer thing
changed and I need to update the code for that.

-Nate