From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Sep 15 12:33:43 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0612E13658 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:33:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from n6.nabble.com (n6.nabble.com [162.255.23.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9B2658B3 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from n6.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n6.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673491B3EB48 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 05:33:42 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 05:33:42 -0700 (MST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1505478822371-0.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <86r2vbg1vk.fsf@newsrv.interne.associated-bears.org> References: <20170912183708.GA16405@mail.michaelwlucas.com> <86r2vbg1vk.fsf@newsrv.interne.associated-bears.org> Subject: Re: should MINIMAL boot? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:33:43 -0000 The definition of a MINIMAL used is a specific one- it does not contain anything which can be loaded by modules. It could be a starting point to something else, but then, it still contains other things you probably not need. If I get the point, I would probably try to boot MINIMAL on a new hardware, build all modules by default, see which modules get loaded and work from there. -- Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/freebsd-current-f3875308.html