From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 20:59:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34BD1065675 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92E98FC1D for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id WAA14133; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:59:02 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1PDkQ9-000AqP-Q0; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:59:01 +0200 Message-ID: <4CD1CD14.4090009@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:59:00 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Chadwick References: <68E248E0-8619-4859-BFFE-1B5F5ABBC51F@airwired.net> <36E416FC-2F45-40C8-A7EC-0E7FA3B603A4@airwired.net> <4CD1BF92.102@freebsd.org> <20101103201155.GA80641@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20101103201155.GA80641@icarus.home.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dan Allen , Sergey Kandaurov , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Re: Fatal trap 18 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:59:35 -0000 on 03/11/2010 22:11 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:01:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> [snipping since I wanna keep it terse] >> >> What I propose is that we try to find a resolution, because I suppose you can't >> stay at the last working revision forever. >> >> P.S. so will you be trying the patch I proposed? > > Andriy, > > I can try your patch out on a Core 2 Duo (E8400) which helped test > the latest Intel CPU topology change when you were looking for testers > (and had no problem), and can also try it out on a Core 2 Quad Q8400 > if need be. Both run amd64. But I suppose you don't have any problems? :) -- Andriy Gapon