From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 17 16:41:27 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF7016A41F
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:41:27 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com)
Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.198])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC0643D62
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:41:26 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com)
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t12so496737wxc
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:41:26 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id;
	b=N6y+stJEvycFXT9zKs1Lf+rlQVKy37azutW1EPhkEB2RYS7T7hJrWiIziAv5AGMoghnFtSe/rgOzduirUR+5fu1VKnk9IQ+LeagqQ2wwGFPktAOGIOFUJbpsJ5APzfvIw/7tUYV9W1QIFrABnavAH+QUPP4snS3+iHHrN4awhSY=
Received: by 10.70.130.1 with SMTP id c1mr5215991wxd;
	Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:41:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129])
	by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h8sm600642wxd.2005.11.17.08.41.24;
	Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:41:25 -0800 (PST)
From: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org,
 pav@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:32:02 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
References: <200511171540.jAHFeJSL017500@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<200511170807.46482.ringworm01@gmail.com>
	<1132244794.79514.28.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1132244794.79514.28.camel@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-6"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200511170832.06601.ringworm01@gmail.com>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/89164: [PATCH] /var/db/pkg/{portname}/+CONTENTS files
	sometimes contain wrong data
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:41:27 -0000

On Thursday 17 November 2005 08:26, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > >  Could you send the standalone bsd.port.mk patch to this PR?
> >
> > Sorry, should have said where it was, gets put
> > into /usr/local/share/portmanager but I'll attach the patch to this
> > message anyways.
>
> So this incorporates your portmanager into bsd.port.mk? I'm afraid we
> can't possibly include this in the official ports tree without making
> portmanager part of base system, do we?
>
> What kind of feedback you're expecting from us, then?

Most important is that you recognize there is a problem with
how +CONTENTS files are generated.  

If no one is interested in writing an alternative to  "${MAKE} 
package-depends" then I've demonstrated how portmanager
may be used as an alternative.

Wether or not you all choose to make portmanager as a part
of the base system is up to you all,  I really just wanted to let
you know that when portmanager is installed in a user system
I'd like it to make the adjustment to bsd.ports.mk.  If portmanager
is removed I'll make sure it smoothly returns bsd.ports.mk
to a usefull state as part of the deinstall process.

-Mike