From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 22:26:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D4D16A48F; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:26:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF4313C45A; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:26:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B9B20B1; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:26:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD0D20AB; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:26:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 184275B8A; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:26:51 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Jeremy Chadwick References: <4676BAF0.4030703@gmail.com> <20070618180813.GA13003@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <322073cc0706181415o17ecd532i971d8bdf5ea1dafd@mail.gmail.com> <20070618221022.GA17952@eos.sc1.parodius.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:26:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070618221022.GA17952@eos.sc1.parodius.com> (Jeremy Chadwick's message of "Mon\, 18 Jun 2007 15\:10\:22 -0700") Message-ID: <868xadj651.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Martin Turgeon , freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 with PAE or AMD64 on PowerEdge with 4G RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:26:25 -0000 Jeremy Chadwick writes: > Like I said, I don't run 64-bit OSes because I prefer compatibility. > Believe me, the instant you run into some quirky problem with either the > kernel or any of its subsystems, or a third-party program (from ports or > otherwise), the first thing you'll be told is "it works for me on i386, > have you tried i386?" Absolute nonsense. FreeBSD is just as solid on amd64 as on i386, and the people who do most of the kernel work in FreeBSD tend to have up-to-date hardware (meaning Athlon64, Opteron, or Core 2). DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no