From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 26 22:42:30 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05714106566B
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:42:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jrhett@netconsonance.com)
Received: from mail.netconsonance.com (mail.netconsonance.com [198.207.204.4])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0828FC14
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:42:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jrhett@netconsonance.com)
Received: from [172.16.12.8] (covad-jrhett.meer.net [209.157.140.144])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by mail.netconsonance.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m5QMgRcM039201; 
	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jrhett@netconsonance.com)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netconsonance.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.288
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.288 tagged_above=-999 required=3.5
	tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44, AWL=-1.848]
Message-Id: <2E8810E6-1663-4996-A3D4-79F91378F1EE@netconsonance.com>
From: Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com>
To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4863C23B.3020802@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924)
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:42:27 -0700
References: <83EB55D5-11A0-44C9-A469-A5C5BD6D972C@netconsonance.com>
	<20080626155616.GI12581@atarininja.org>
	<4863C23B.3020802@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.924)
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: split the quagga ports to remove unstable patches from quagga
	port
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:42:30 -0000

On Jun 26, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> I agree. Two ports are overkill for only TCPMD5 option. And it  
> should not be a show stopper for the port update.


Should not be, but is.  If you can convince Boris to update the port  
without having a working MD5 patch then my reasoning becomes invalid.   
But at the moment the port is held hostage by the MD5 patches.

-- 
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source  
and other randomness