From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 5 18:06:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA03303 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 5 May 1997 18:06:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA03296 for ; Mon, 5 May 1997 18:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.5/8.6.9) id LAA20852; Tue, 6 May 1997 11:04:48 +1000 Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 11:04:48 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199705060104.LAA20852@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, jkh@time.cdrom.com Subject: Re: /usr/include/ftpio.h is not C++ safe Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, nadav@barcode.co.il Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Now you might respond "ah, but I was speaking in generalities - I >didn't mean libftpio specifically so much as I meant any library with >headers in /usr/include", In which case I could only put my head in my >hands at the thought of going through all those libraries and adding >ANSI-variant prototypes, much less making them all C++ safe. They all already support K&R except , , , , , , , , , , . I.e., all except 0 CSRG-derived headers, 2 LBL-derived ones (pcap*), 3 Linux-derived ones (dialog, ncurses, unctrl) and 6 jkh/phk headers (the rest) support K&R. >I think it's a slippery slope you're trying to negotiate there, Bruce; >watch your footing. ;-) You're on the slope :-). Bruce