From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 15 18:20:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254A037BB51; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 18:20:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA26825; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 18:20:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 18:20:08 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Denis DeLaRoca <denis@acacia.cts.ucla.edu> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libc.so.4 for 3.4-STABLE In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003151802260.519-100000@acacia.cts.ucla.edu> Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003151819001.26438-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Denis DeLaRoca wrote: > All I did was do a network upgrade to the 3.4-20000311-STABLE snapshot... > from what you are saying the X11 3.3.6 binaries included in the snapshot > was built perhaps under FBSD 4.x? I was trying to avoid compiling by > upgrading via the snapshot. If that was the case it would certainly explain the libc error. I don't know why it would be or if there's some other explanation, though :( Perhaps try another snapshot? Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message