From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Mar 15 18:20:10 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 254A037BB51; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 18:20:09 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost (kris@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA26825;
	Wed, 15 Mar 2000 18:20:08 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 18:20:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To: Denis DeLaRoca <denis@acacia.cts.ucla.edu>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: libc.so.4 for 3.4-STABLE
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003151802260.519-100000@acacia.cts.ucla.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003151819001.26438-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Denis DeLaRoca wrote:

> All I did was do a network upgrade to the 3.4-20000311-STABLE snapshot...
> from what you are saying the X11 3.3.6 binaries included in the snapshot
> was built perhaps under FBSD 4.x? I was trying to avoid compiling by
> upgrading via the snapshot.

If that was the case it would certainly explain the libc error. I don't
know why it would be or if there's some other explanation, though :(

Perhaps try another snapshot?

Kris

----
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
    -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message