Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:24:51 -0700 From: Ade Lovett <ade@freebsd.org> To: mjacob@freebsd.org Cc: Ade Lovett <ade@freebsd.org>, scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hysteresis for CAM_RESRC_UNAVAIL Message-ID: <026A0839-92B8-42CC-A42D-BB1658923180@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060926201700.I5664@ns1.feral.com> References: <20060926085839.Q98053@ns1.feral.com> <4519A603.8080108@samsco.org> <92A8EEB3-28FD-45A2-8099-AD0942820C4B@FreeBSD.org> <20060926193731.G5448@ns1.feral.com> <D065D6AF-93EC-432A-A3B4-3F90D1645DE0@freebsd.org> <20060926201700.I5664@ns1.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 26, 2006, at 20:18 , mjacob@freebsd.org wrote: > I'll redo this with a tunable and send out again. Should I include > BUSY status as well? Personally speaking, I see no harm in offering up two tunables at this point. The overhead isn't going to kill us, and it provides for maximum flexibility. -aDe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?026A0839-92B8-42CC-A42D-BB1658923180>