From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 5 00:12:04 2012 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96331065670 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 00:12:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9377C8FC14 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 00:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadz14 with SMTP id z14so3256288dad.17 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 17:12:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HV957pZKhlgWd5jJCFkz9qxoVGwZGAQ+UyEmZepeuSQ=; b=y7TaI5meST+oE3OMGBLpdFCKRW0ELf8SZy5LBGA3jc5eRjeYRKBmTNSjFD9nnvQzvz U977LdGvPFQEAzH6cAvILNM05BGFgz/1rbzWiagaXb5ZIi+aUvA25Tk8o1HMpY8+6YUo 7xHxWjvUsfsfetElk126B42ZIMahJrmBpr04yecmjO93mU5YXYsr1AmQRuOjDPWyFkBA c3pQfprBUphDWPP7RHzNq8tjPrPZYHmgtapU7Zr0Mvy1HxR4UQPG2KCC1ghhx9PbvJte Ojpyet1DgWBFS5ndcqYu6OqFPwCZhwt0yXz4jGFfGZvUSxptJf6/owIxhBIU+MQ6Uife 2AMA== Received: by 10.68.195.169 with SMTP id if9mr2170602pbc.68.1333584724420; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 17:12:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com ([114.111.62.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i5sm1657948pbf.19.2012.04.04.17.12.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 04 Apr 2012 17:12:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 05 Apr 2012 09:11:52 -0700 From: YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:11:52 -0700 To: enoch <ixew@hotmail.com> Message-ID: <20120405161152.GA14289@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <20120402195215.GA3571@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <jlblna$ptp$1@dough.gmane.org> <20120403023225.GD3571@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <87ty11670b.fsf@hotmail.com> <20120403183521.GA7380@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <87obr95pxh.fsf@hotmail.com> <20120403225422.GB7380@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <87sjgk5czo.fsf@hotmail.com> <20120404210445.GB10911@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <87vclfwqp4.fsf@hotmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vclfwqp4.fsf@hotmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [nfe] DHCP failure on 8-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>, <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>, <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:12:04 -0000 On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:51:19AM -0400, enoch wrote: > YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:37:15AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 01:45:30AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> >> YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> writes: > >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 07:36:36PM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> >> >> YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> writes: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:50:02AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 04/02/2012 03:52 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:40:44AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> On 03/30/2012 19:38, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:01:52AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>>> Recently it became extremely difficult to pass the DHCP discovery step > >> >> >> >> >>>> on boot. Now I am using the buggy [nve] instead. > >> >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >> >>>> Can anyone help? > >> >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >>> Did you set synchronous_dhclient option in rc.conf? > >> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Yes: ifconfig_nfe0="SYNCDHCP" > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> I guess [nfe] is undergoing gradual devel changes of some sort as before > >> >> >> >> >> it had some chance of reporting "empty headers" on initial ifconfig and > >> >> >> >> >> refusing to work. Sorry, I should have reported when encountering the > >> >> >> >> >> first problems rather than solve by reboot. > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > Would you show me the output of both dmesg(nfe(4) and its PHY only) > >> >> >> >> > and 'sysctl dev.nfe.0.stats'? > >> >> >> >> > It would be also helpful to know whether nfe(4) still sees > >> >> >> >> > incoming traffic. > >> >> >> >> > Does assigning static IP work? > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Static IP direct communication attempt from this desktop to another > >> >> >> >> laptop through a crossover cable fails as follows. Thanks. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> nfe0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 > >> >> >> >> options=82008<VLAN_MTU,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE> > >> >> >> >> ether 00:1f:bc:00:19:dc > >> >> >> >> inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > >> >> >> >> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT > >> >> >> >> <full-duplex,flowcontrol,master,rxpause,txpause>) > >> >> >> >> status: active > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> nfe0: link state changed to UP > >> >> >> >> nfe0: <NVIDIA nForce 430 MCP13 Networking Adapter> port 0xf200-0xf207 > >> >> >> >> mem 0xefffb000-0xefffbfff irq 21 at device 20.0 on pci0 > >> >> >> >> miibus1: <MII bus> on nfe0 > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > It seems you've omitted PHY driver here. What PHY driver was > >> >> >> > attached to nfe(4)? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> miibus1: <MII bus> on nfe0 > >> >> >> rgephy1: <RTL8169S/8110S/8211B media interface> PHY 1 on miibus1 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> nfe0: Ethernet address: 00:1f:bc:00:19:dc > >> >> >> >> nfe0: [FILTER] > >> >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) > >> >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) > >> >> >> >> nfe0: link state changed to UP > >> >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) > >> >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) > >> >> >> >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.frame_errors: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.extra_bytes: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.late_cols: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.runts: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.jumbos: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.fifo_overuns: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.crc_errors: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.fae: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.len_errors: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.unicast: 56 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.multicast: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.broadcast: 280 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.octets: 7517 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.zero_rexmits: 51 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.one_rexmits: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.multi_rexmits: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.late_cols: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.fifo_underuns: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.carrier_losts: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.excess_deferrals: 0 > >> >> >> >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.retry_errors: 0 > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Thanks. Would you show me the output of "pciconf -lcbv"? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> nfe0@pci0:0:20:0: class=0x068000 card=0x10003842 chip=0x026910de rev=0xa3 hdr=0x00 > >> >> >> vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' > >> >> >> device = 'MCP51 Network Bus Enumerator' > >> >> >> class = bridge > >> >> >> bar [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xefffb000, size 4096, enabled > >> >> >> bar [14] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xf200, size 8, enabled > >> >> >> cap 01[44] = powerspec 2 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Interestingly, now that nfe0 is using a static IP it sometimes boots > >> >> >> up properly. Are you interested in its good working? > >> >> > > >> >> > Yes I am. Would you try attached patch and let me know whether the > >> >> > patch makes any difference on your box? > >> >> > >> >> Sorry to report: The patch was applied (to 8-stable latest code) but out > >> >> of 3 boots only one succeeded. Same stream of "nfe0: discard frame w/o > >> >> leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0)" messages. > >> > > >> > Ok, back out previous patch and try attached one. > >> > >> With these two patch files applied to the 8-stable code, buildkernel > >> fails as follows. > >> > >> /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c: In function 'nfe_attach': > >> /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c:629: error: 'struct mii_softc' has no member named 'mii_mpd_oui' > >> /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c:629: error: 'struct mii_softc' has no member named 'mii_mpd_oui' > >> /usr/src/sys/modules/nfe/../../dev/nfe/if_nfe.c:630: error: 'struct mii_softc' has no member named 'mii_mpd_model' > >> *** Error code 1 > >> > > > > Oops, sorry I forgot that this part of change was not merged to > > stable/8. I've attached a minimal patch which would be cleanly > > applied to stable/8. > > Wasn't the attached diff3 already included in diff2? Seems to me the > wrong file was attached this time. Please advise. diff2 is subset of diff3 but it can be merged to stable/8 and stable/7. Probably diff2 may have better chance to fully reinitialize PHY but let's see whether diff3 also makes difference on your box. So back out any changes and apply diff3. > > > > >> Sorry, I can't handle 9-stable. Enoch.