From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 16 19:33:48 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA00487 for current-outgoing; Thu, 16 May 1996 19:33:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nervosa.com (root@nervosa.com [192.187.228.86]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA00477 for ; Thu, 16 May 1996 19:33:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onyx.nervosa.com (coredump@onyx.nervosa.com [10.0.0.1]) by nervosa.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA19675 for ; Thu, 16 May 1996 19:33:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 19:33:35 -0700 (PDT) From: invalid opcode To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Is this is a stupid patch? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I modified rlogin(1) to support user@host style parameters like this: rlogin coredump@nervosa.com as opposed to rlogin -l coredump nervosa.com Do you think this is a useful or stupid patch? - begin --------------------------------------------------- *** rlogin.c Thu May 16 19:28:27 1996 --- rlogin.c.new Thu May 16 19:25:39 1996 *************** *** 241,246 **** --- 241,251 ---- if (!user) user = pw->pw_name; + if (p = rindex(host, '@')) { + user[host - p] = '\0'; + host = ++p; + } + sp = NULL; #ifdef KERBEROS if (use_kerberos) { - end --------------------------------------------------- == Chris Layne ======================================== Nervosa Computing == == coredump@nervosa.com ================ http://www.nervosa.com/~coredump ==