Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 21:53:55 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Subject: Re: lp64 vs lp32 printf Message-ID: <20021008215355.O97120@espresso.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20021008212240.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:22:40PM -0400 References: <20021008203120.K97120@espresso.q9media.com> <XFMail.20021008212240.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes: > On 09-Oct-2002 Mike Barcroft wrote: > > Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> writes: > >> > >> What's the accepted way to printf something (like sizeof()) which > >> boils down to "unsigned int" on x86 and "unsigned long" on the LP64 > >> platforms? > > > > In userland you can use %z for printing size_t's. In the kernel, > > casting to intmax_t/uintmax_t and using %j is correct. > > We could add '%z' to the kernel and change whatever hack %z DDB is > using in db_printf() to be some other letter. This would be ideal. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021008215355.O97120>