From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 15:51:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965651065675 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:51:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F6D8FC19 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:51:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Cc:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=yrqBaXbkRd0ledfS3gZhxcwerQDLYI27XMHk6RqWRtQ=; b=VGe4fTxFtwUnGtyK1aUO29lnCKw9Mc71g2RPa4NRCBDDU80/YPD2vozBqfRGyQ4XBLjA430qMYM5KxYHf+JkHHACX5VgnvbSIcFHrXf9zto+M7+ieMoA743Quhkm0bu2; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1T6O4r-000HgD-Di; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:51:42 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1346169093-3058-3056/5/7; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:51:33 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <503CE60F.8040007@yahoo.de> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:51:33 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <503CE60F.8040007@yahoo.de> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.01 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5 X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: Norbert Aschendorff Subject: Re: IPv4 vs. IPv6 Ethernet Performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:51:43 -0000 I'd guess it has to do with incomplete offload code for ipv6, but I'm sure you'll see bz chiming in with details. :-)