From owner-freebsd-ports Thu May 14 06:27:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA28066 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 14 May 1998 06:27:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rich.chel.su (root@mobil.surnet.ru [195.54.2.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA28061 for ; Thu, 14 May 1998 06:27:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andy@icc.surw.chel.su) Received: from icc.surw.chel.su (surw.chel.su [195.54.2.162]) by rich.chel.su (8.7.2/Murphy) with ESMTP id TAA12056 for ; Thu, 14 May 1998 19:27:31 +0600 (UDT) Received: (from andy@localhost) by icc.surw.chel.su (8.8.5/8.8.4) id RAA21940 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 May 1998 17:30:37 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 17:30:37 +0400 (MSD) From: Andrey Zakhvatov Message-Id: <199805141330.RAA21940@icc.surw.chel.su> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Qt directory layout Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello! One question: what you think about Qt package directory layout? I request ${X11BASE/include/qt directory for include files, not ${X11BASE}/include/X11/qt. I think that most of X11 packages must install includes in ${X11BASE}/include/ and shared files in ${X11BASE}/share/, not in ${X11BASE}/lib/. Maybe I'm wrong? What is your opinions? Sincerely yours, Andy. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message