From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 16:22:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B89654A for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 16:22:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists.tech@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C49DE9D for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 16:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hq4so2115381wib.6 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 08:22:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1eJpELnk2wxAgSorMsnUnFc0q7LpgAS2JjEufnOXyZU=; b=pyiMA3tRNYrT/XpnXwDk9Q+ENIFefOgAUFUxc0Uvp8FXN6ZLKkoXAQdmRam8mb+PZ7 MliKJ/dFabpLAKixsVQSfv1vjQaLdPccQJsOF1oqN+6PAk/MO1/TVgbaW1ImgXHAJmZG 63cnpPgJe04J+yZ/FnIEUsjJVATKzDTn/WzpUsVtZl87Z875v2+IOyNsQmfwOjvikMtX m0KTHPKWqWnbYu+kQ3+cctKoIKOOy4vOgHa/QV37oKRHusrGQ5DGBRFEyij5xr19mkoD yPjif7GuNMYLvfmbdAkf5DFzA2xhb+CDb32TsVgVV3VQEhbjFBrWa6Soec+4whc1ZKte fHCQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.85.226 with SMTP id k2mr6214680wiz.34.1359908528178; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 08:22:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.203.18 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 08:22:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5C7CB337-0D6F-4C95-9227-C3D14E2F2493@dckd.nl> References: <5C7CB337-0D6F-4C95-9227-C3D14E2F2493@dckd.nl> Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:22:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 and Xen 4.0? From: tech mailinglists To: Jeroen van der Ham Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "" X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:22:15 -0000 Hello, I can not give you an feedback for 4.0 (the data you gave looks for me like Xen and Debian Squeeze) but I can say that 4.2 with Linux 3.7.4 with Debian Squeeze as Dom0 is doing a good job with FreeBSD 9.0 and 9.1 HVMs Best Regards 2013/2/3 Jeroen van der Ham > Hi, > > I've been trying various things in my current setup with FreeBSD 9.1, but > to no avail currently. > I have tried the following setup on an AMD Opteron system, with kernel > 2.6.32 on Dom0, using 4.0.1-2: > > kernel = '/usr/lib/xen-4.0/boot/hvmloader' > device_model = '/usr/lib/xen-4.0/bin/qemu-dm' > builder = 'hvm' > > memory = 512 > shadow_memory = 8 > vcpus = 4 > cpus = "2-7" > name = "image01" > > #FreeBSD HVM > disk = [ > 'file:/xen/staging/FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE-amd64-bootonly.iso,hdc:cdrom,r', > 'phy:/dev/xendata/image,hda,w', > ] > > boot = 'd' > sdl=0 > stdvga=0 > serial='pty' > > > > This boots, and then goes into a loop printing "pudna: fpcurthread == > curthread xx times" when it tries to mount the filesystem. > > Has anyone been succesful in installing FreeBSD 9.1 using Xen-4.0 ? > > Jeroen. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >