From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 20 14:36:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D7E37B425; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 14:36:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0005F43FA3; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 14:36:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ticso@cicely9.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3KLZjcx066370 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Sun, 20 Apr 2003 23:36:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely9.cicely.de) Received: from cicely9.cicely.de (cicely9.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:210:5aff:fe30:1c1a]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3KLZfmU008150 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Apr 2003 23:35:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely9.cicely.de) Received: from cicely9.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely9.cicely.de (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h3KLZetA024092; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 23:35:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely9.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely9.cicely.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3KLZdm1024091; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 23:35:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 23:35:38 +0200 From: Bernd Walter To: Jake Burkholder Message-ID: <20030420213537.GB20422@cicely9.cicely.de> References: <200304141404.h3EE48aL034057@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030416101546.GW529@cicely9.cicely.de> <20030420202527.GB42856@locore.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030420202527.GB42856@locore.ca> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely9.cicely.de 5.0-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i cc: Hidetoshi Shimokawa cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: Bernd Walter cc: ticso@cicely.de cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf NOTES files src/sys/dev/usb FILES ehci.c ehci_pci.c ehcireg.h ehcivar.h usb.c src/sys/modules/usb Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 21:36:21 -0000 On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 04:25:28PM -0400, Jake Burkholder wrote: > Apparently, On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 12:15:47PM +0200, > Bernd Walter said words to the effect of; > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 11:23:30AM +0900, Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote: > > > At Mon, 14 Apr 2003 07:04:08 -0700 (PDT), > > > Bernd Walter wrote: > > > Is this device supposed to work on sparc64? > > > > I don't know a reason why not. > > I don't know if this device is an exception, but the USB framework in > general does not use busdma, so its not MI and won't work on sparc64. This device is not an exception - it wouldn't make much sense without doing OHCI first as both are very similar in design. joe said he would do busdma for OHCI, but I'm not shure if the porting just stalled. Is busdma realy an absolute required feature for sparc64? OHCI works on alpha and it should be endian clean. Unfortunately my test alpha did not initialize more than function 0, so I wasn't able to test EHCI on alpha, but I'm almost shure it will work. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de