From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Sep 17 11:45:07 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id LAA22611 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 11:45:07 -0700 Received: from emory.mathcs.emory.edu (emory.mathcs.emory.edu [128.140.2.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA22605 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 11:45:05 -0700 Received: by emory.mathcs.emory.edu (5.65/Emory_mathcs.4.0.16) via UUCP id AA05373 ; Sun, 17 Sep 95 13:50:31 -0400 Received: from localhost (jan@localhost) by bagend.atl.ga.us (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA10545 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 13:35:59 -0400 Message-Id: <199509171735.NAA10545@bagend.atl.ga.us> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD suffer from the Intel RZ1000 IDE bug? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 17 Sep 1995 14:36:15 +0200." <199509171236.OAA03299@keltia.Freenix.FR> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 13:35:59 -0400 From: Jan Isley Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Ollivier Robert writes: > > Apple and IDE... Pfff. > > If there was one thing they did right in the Mac, it was to choose SCSI. This was an economic decision. IDE drives cost less. -- Jan Isley | Running UseVote 3.0 votes to: | Powered by FreeBSD