From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Wed May 31 22:01:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BF8B95A60; Wed, 31 May 2017 22:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etnapierala@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 367716E75A; Wed, 31 May 2017 22:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etnapierala@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id b84so135654790wmh.0; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:01:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=laV6EJtAv+mctmxM60ZrG9If9yPiv7Ps52D/8y6XvDE=; b=NQnL5MceklY9rV5pzG9pUeLCqhnIsW3R+4lcBpOwJWgYSx8zJSwZDb88B5crStNVE5 KytGJOIOs6sz0RFnh0xfmZtY/LzoyBJWxDsbX+cAEptPKP81n7bBpKkUsPyOILE2XmFi s9Uv8QPMrDxBmcLPicKMt4aeVL57Jo7lH8Uoy1xK1q/D5w0R1X5/kgB+M3qU59w3zw5w HFS4+zJtwNGIROOyIZ6hGm+Wr8QDles6mTYo/W75stBxY5cWV8CfGsqFoMS9IwbFcKEK zHLZ0MdOoBy+ioiw8IeTqXNPInPyF1f8mMxsALR+oVUXCX0JcDsOvDuHSMnhXWtVgIzm PgRw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=laV6EJtAv+mctmxM60ZrG9If9yPiv7Ps52D/8y6XvDE=; b=Elo44NW0fuhFksoq1f9hAhk5Kpup10z6lknpUkRP9rUCsBrjaBhGHD3TvmFxQYkjUV lzs//e5NF9cQHi7ljv4nsNxki0P0ffivhwbaOdnUvIo5n8sY/JwO8e6tvSZ3+a8fZyfr xzKPUR4xoH+akxt9f4O3IHPqnP8Js0DrKoxt4h25otlUt0ebBKKZUU2R0r+b0Zjhwg1I YCnHtXtCTTprU8A/x5D16l2nUg9JPMWD8aXvYUyD4BUAXE45OHIj8ezknC/nH1YKk3LT SFPqt6rBi/eofDag03GVoHRUfkDmEXGlm8jPkS+LlXUNR1j15I6PsgMFGEPk+7ZeaP0L pQMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDnkHqyqzdySXhoq8QNifa+kP78NczibVR3b5G/0L+UT+kV2VLe yC2Q9oxWdnZU+ZVU X-Received: by 10.28.29.6 with SMTP id d6mr7276590wmd.71.1496268093625; Wed, 31 May 2017 15:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brick (cpc92310-cmbg19-2-0-cust934.5-4.cable.virginm.net. [82.9.227.167]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x37sm31109185wrb.42.2017.05.31.15.01.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 May 2017 15:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 22:33:47 +0100 From: Edward Tomasz Napierala To: rgrimes@freebsd.org Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r319075 - head/usr.bin/rctl Message-ID: <20170531213347.GA3597@brick> Mail-Followup-To: rgrimes@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org References: <201705281713.v4SHDdqx004022@repo.freebsd.org> <201705290301.v4T31xQk020240@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201705290301.v4T31xQk020240@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 22:01:35 -0000 On 0528T2001, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ] > > Author: trasz > > Date: Sun May 28 17:13:38 2017 > > New Revision: 319075 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/319075 > > > > Log: > > Random tweaks to rctl(8). > > Please try to be descriptive of what it is your tweaking, > think about having to come back in 10 years and read the > svn log trying to find some change and seeing this in > the log not knowing if that is the tweak your looking > for or not. Thanks. You're right; I'll try to be less sloppy next time.