From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 21:20:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62511106566C for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 21:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1E28FC1D for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 21:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q47LKEbC048010 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 21:20:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q47LKE1Q048009; Mon, 7 May 2012 21:20:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 21:20:14 GMT Message-Id: <201205072120.q47LKE1Q048009@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.org From: Tijl Coosemans Cc: Subject: Re: ports/166803: [patch] sysutils/xfce4-utils: fix running/killing of gpg-agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tijl Coosemans List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 21:20:15 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/166803; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tijl Coosemans To: Rene Ladan Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/166803: [patch] sysutils/xfce4-utils: fix running/killing of gpg-agent Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 23:10:46 +0200 On 07-05-2012 22:49, Rene Ladan wrote: > I cannot find entries containing gpg, gnupg, or setenv in > /var/log/messages* (or maybe they got expunged). According to > gpg-agent(1), --sh forces the use of sh to format the output instead of > using the value of $SHELL, is this what you intend? Yes, it's similar to the --sh-syntax flag of dbus-launch and the -s flag of ssh-agent, both of which the script already uses. FYI, I reported the problem upstream and they said 4.10 should be ok because it no longer uses a shell script: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8718