From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 15 23:22:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B6B16A41F for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 23:22:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from hydra.bec.de (www.ostsee-abc.de [62.206.222.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536CF43D55 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 23:22:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from britannica.bec.de (storm.stura.uni-rostock.de [139.30.252.72]) by hydra.bec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2B235707 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:22:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by britannica.bec.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A17DE6D047; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:21:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:21:43 +0100 From: joerg@britannica.bec.de To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051215232143.GC203@britannica.bec.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20051215223745.GA37768@FreeBSD.czest.pl> <43A1F97A.3060102@sh.cvut.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <43A1F97A.3060102@sh.cvut.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: [CALL FOR TESTERS] New system call: abort2() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 23:22:10 -0000 On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:17:14AM +0100, Václav Haisman wrote: > > I would like to comment on FreeBSD style(9) a bit. Why does not mention > or even encourage C99 style // comments? They are nice when one wants to > comment out bigger chunks of code with /**/ comment. Use #if 0 ... #endif for that. Joerg > On the similar note, the ability to move declarations closer to the > point of use in code is IMO nice feature, too. The style(9) doesn't > mention this either. Because it is not necessarily a good thing. Joerg