From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Apr 27 11:41:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from web804.mail.yahoo.com (web804.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53C7637B70A for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 11:41:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from raysonlogin@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 2158 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Apr 2000 18:41:27 -0000 Message-ID: <20000427184127.2157.qmail@web804.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [128.100.13.59] by web804.mail.yahoo.com; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 11:41:27 PDT Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 11:41:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Rayson Ho Subject: Re: Multithreaded server performance To: A G F Keahan , "Richard Seaman, Jr." Cc: Jason Evans , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Both Solaris and NT have good thread implementations: http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/usenix-nt98/zabatta.html Read this paper -- There is something about NT threads implementation which has never been released in any books! > the goal is to > do better than NT > (which surprisingly does quite a good job when it > comes to processing > lots of threads). Solaris's threads are pretty > darn good too, but I > dislike all things SystemV-ish, and Solaris/x86 > isn't all that hot > either (compared with the version for the > UltraSPARC). __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online and get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message