Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:03:37 -0600 From: PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@dlink.ua>, freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please Test: Updated Ral Driver Patch for rt2860/rt3090 Message-ID: <CAFZ_MY%2B6HZ3_wE2nV%2BHSRX0DW_zVhCAgwGhE7Uzh7DbEEr5WuQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonhPj7JjHzz7vs9KC5L-wbjUcKXQS-AkyZHp8Jz7cOjpA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFZ_MYJsNF-XMp_61udyLhn0y-_-bM22izHFLnNE1vkuAnyz1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20120313123037.0eb29eb9.ray@dlink.ua> <CAFZ_MY%2B3OzK89TQ1c9JWvR0mdJ7YuOuojggmKCtKsUnh0LBDHg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonhPj7JjHzz7vs9KC5L-wbjUcKXQS-AkyZHp8Jz7cOjpA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > Did we ever port that bar fix to 8, 7? No. One time I manually patched 8.2-RELEASE with all 80211 stack updates, but ifconfig didn't work with patched kernel. So, I updated ifconfig. Then it wanted a newer library (don't remember exactly which). That was when I gave up. > > I'm pretty sure I giot it in before -9 made it.. Yes, it is in 9.0-RELEASE AK > > > > adrian > > On 13 March 2012 16:42, PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@dlink.ua> wrote: >>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:06 -0600 >>> PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca> wrote: >>> >>>>> > ------------------------------ >>>>> > >>>>> > Message: 12 >>>>> > Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:14:23 -0700 >>>>> > From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> >>>>> > Subject: Re: Please Test: Updated Ral Driver Patch for >>>>> > rt2860/rt3090 To: "Sevan / Venture37" <venture37@gmail.com> >>>>> > Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org >>>>> > Message-ID: >>>>> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0<CAJ-Vmo=3DjJmwY=3DbTVaKFYTd--1E9vzwgn54VMJyY82bc9pS= WcBg@mail.gmail.com> >>>>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 >>>>> > >>>>> > On 11 March 2012 14:10, Sevan / Venture37 <venture37@gmail.com> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >>> I'll post a new one in a bit. If you want to help, would you be >>>>> >>> ok with git as opposed to hg? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> nope not at all but if its because of familiarity then in this >>>>> >> scenario it doesn't make much difference which is used, same work >>>>> >> flow, change, commit, push, pull, rinse, repeat. :) >>>>> > >>>>> > Hiya, >>>>> > >>>>> > Let's just strip the ^M's from the tree and as long as ray@ and >>>>> > pseudocyclon are a-ok with the work thus far, I'll commit it to >>>>> > -HEAD. >>>>> > >>>>> > We can then tidy things up from there. >>>>> > >>>>> > I just don't want to commit ^M's to the tree, or blatant style(9) >>>>> > violations. But we can always tidy things up incrementally once >>>>> > they're in the tree. >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> I've talked about ieee80211_send_bar() with matt, already. >>> >>> Can you please point me to that discussion? >>> >> >> rt2860_send_bar() is a workaround. Because we patched freebsd >> ieee80211_send_bar(), we can simply call it instead of calling the >> workaround function on r225013 and up. >> >> >> AK
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFZ_MY%2B6HZ3_wE2nV%2BHSRX0DW_zVhCAgwGhE7Uzh7DbEEr5WuQ>