From owner-freebsd-scsi Wed Aug 1 8:49:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo.feral.com [192.67.166.79]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB1B37B401 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2001 08:49:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from wonky.feral.com (mjacob@wonky.feral.com [192.67.166.7]) by beppo.feral.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f71FnDI17603; Wed, 1 Aug 2001 08:49:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 08:48:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: To: "Justin T. Gibbs" Cc: "Jose M. Alcaide" , Subject: Re: DLT 4000 throughput and cstream In-Reply-To: <200107311706.f6VH6kI34994@aslan.scsiguy.com> Message-ID: <20010801084833.B57962-100000@wonky.feral.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > >It does indeed look like this *might* be a dump issue- but it also could > >simply be that any single threaded action for dump(8) is going to make for > >lousy performance. > > Dump has lots of issues. I once talked with John Polstra about fixing it. > The scheme we talked about would have increased dumps performance by ~10X. > Unfortunately the funding for that project (at my former employer) dried up. Was this was for implementing the async i/o stuff that Solaris used? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message