From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 3 20:20:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B220B1065673 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 20:20:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (cl-162.ewr-01.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4830:1200:a1::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42EA08FC1D for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 20:20:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m23KKG9Y059710; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:20:16 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: (from brooks@localhost) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id m23KKGsc059709; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:20:16 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:20:16 -0600 From: Brooks Davis To: Chuck Robey Message-ID: <20080303202016.GD57043@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <47CC4B51.3060903@chuckr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47CC4B51.3060903@chuckr.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (lor.one-eyed-alien.net [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:20:16 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: using ctags for current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:20:21 -0000 --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 02:02:41PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: > is there any support is the Makefiles (for our FreeBSD source) for ctags? > Beyond that, it used to be true that the ctags that resides in our ports > was called Exhuberant Ctags, and the writer wrote it expressly for FreeBSD > (at forst, now it seems to be GPL'ed), it used to be a great deal better > thant hea native ctags, and is there any reason that I shouldn't use the > Exhuberant Ctags? We've got a "make tags" target that defaults to using gtags but will use ctags if CTARGS=ctags. I found it with "grep ctags /usr/share/mk/*" > Now I gotta do something I haven't done before, which is figure out how to > get cvs to ignore the changes I hack to the src/usr.bin/ctags makefile to > remove the install target. This oughta be good for a laugh, as I try to > see if I can blow away my archive. I'd suggest producing a patch to allow disabling ctags with a WITHOUT_CTAGS knob. It seems like the sort of thing we'd want to be able to disable for small systems anyway. It looks like the current strategy is to modify src/usr.bin/Makefile and the the appropriate magic to add a new src.conf knob. (Is that documented anywhere?) -- Brooks --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHzF2AXY6L6fI4GtQRAqiyAJsHm0MaNZsmi5pMIQgmZpDfLsZyQQCfQjjE ahL/dWH2oDlyoQtnD9vlwkk= =xoXr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T--