From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Feb 8 11:55:51 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA21812 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 11:55:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cons.org (knight.cons.org [194.233.237.86]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA21806 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 11:55:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cracauer@cons.org) Received: (from cracauer@localhost) by cons.org (8.8.8/8.7.3) id UAA09463; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 20:55:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 20:55:34 +0100 From: Martin Cracauer To: Brett Glass Cc: Martin Cracauer , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 100Mbit ethernet card comparision Message-ID: <19990208205534.A9430@cons.org> References: <4.1.19990208115114.0457c800@mail.lariat.org> <19990208145325.A8384@cons.org> <4.1.19990208115114.0457c800@mail.lariat.org> <19990208200523.A9112@cons.org> <4.1.19990208120931.04582e90@mail.lariat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990208120931.04582e90@mail.lariat.org>; from Brett Glass on Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 12:15:02PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In <4.1.19990208120931.04582e90@mail.lariat.org>, Brett Glass wrote: > I just noted that rl was about as fast as de. Yes, there's more interrupt > overhead, but does this qualify as suicide? Please read second tabsle of my original mail. > Most of my FreeBSD machines -- > even the 486es -- lope along with such low CPU utilization that they > could probably spare the CPU. Yes, but throughput is mimimized. Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ Tel.: (private) +4940 5221829 Fax.: (private) +4940 5228536 Paper: (private) Waldstrasse 200, 22846 Norderstedt, Germany To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message