From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  5 05:31:02 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 35E2837B401; Thu,  5 Jun 2003 05:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net (heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net
	[207.217.120.189])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A009243F85; Thu,  5 Jun 2003 05:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com)
Received: from user-2ivfmr7.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.247.219.103]
	helo=mindspring.com)
	by heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128)
	(Exim 3.33 #1)	id 19NttU-0005N5-00; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 05:31:01 -0700
Message-ID: <3EDF37B9.1F5EF3FD@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 05:29:45 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
References: <20030605104620.GA47983@sunbay.com>
	<20030605120903.GB53363@sunbay.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4fa451d01bf32dbc28bebbafd18575535387f7b89c61deb1d350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
cc: arch@freebsd.org
cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>
Subject: Re: A proposed drastic cleanup of the telnet build.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 12:31:02 -0000

Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Are the telnet sources really considered crypto sources?
> Yes, they use crypto functionality if compiled with the
> corresponding options, but they just USE them, they
> don't PROVIDE them.  As such, should we treat them as
> restricted?  If yes, I'd like to (please) hear why are
> they treated as such?  If not, then the solution is
> obvious, keep them under src/*/(lib)telnet(d).

I think the answer is "the better to deprecate telnet, by
making it harder to get working".  8-|.

-- Terry