From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 10 10:04:00 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B79106566C
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:04:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from vanhu@zeninc.net)
Received: from smtp.zeninc.net (smtp.zeninc.net [80.67.176.25])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1784C8FC18
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:03:59 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from vanhu@zeninc.net)
Received: from albator.zen.inc (albator.zen.inc [192.168.1.5])
	by smtp.zeninc.net (smtpd) with ESMTP id B877E2798B8;
	Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:03:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: by albator.zen.inc (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A1FEB731C7; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:03:57 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:03:57 +0100
From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@FreeBSD.org>
To: Giulio Ferro <auryn@zirakzigil.org>
Message-ID: <20090110100357.GB2718@zeninc.net>
References: <49685F15.7080605@zirakzigil.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49685F15.7080605@zirakzigil.org>
User-Agent: All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less.
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NATT patch on current
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:04:00 -0000

Hi.

On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 09:40:53AM +0100, Giulio Ferro wrote:
> I just wanted to report that the nat-traversal patch on HEAD 2008-03-19
> fails to apply cleanly.
> The problem is in the file ipsec.c lines 1847, 1870
>
> Any news for the natt integration in CURRENT?

Thanks for the report.
I'm currently working on cleaning the PFKey part of the patch
(available on Perforce if you're interested, and I hope our tests to
be ok in a few days, so I'll send kernel+userland patch for public
test/review), so I don't use anymore the public version of the patch
for TRUNK.

I'll be mostly AFK for the next 2-3 days, but I'll try to find quickly
some time to update the public patch soon.


Yvan.