From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 00:03:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2678E106566C; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 00:03:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716328FC16; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 00:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5103J86027202; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 02:03:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n5103JDV027199; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 02:03:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 02:03:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: GT In-Reply-To: <1243809390.6672.17.camel@ubuntu> Message-ID: References: <20090530160540.C5BCD106575F@hub.freebsd.org> <20090531142921.B65025@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <1243809390.6672.17.camel@ubuntu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: postmaster@freebsd.org, Ian Smith , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's wrong with this picture? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:03:26 -0000 > passed muster from any reasonable moderator (aye, but there's the rub: > who gets to define 'reasonable'?). > > The phrase "You're fast to agree with our resident M$ troll when he > argues against government control of anything, even of protecting the > population from a 'free' market that's happy to profit by poisoning > people in body or mind" stands in stark contrast to your exhortation > that he "focus [his] energies on things you do know something about". > > I'm against moderation, for the simple reason that people who want to be > moderators will bring their baggage to their efforts (like your > "corporations kill the environment and are protected by the 'free' > market" stuff, or my "government is the problem, full stop: Caedite Eos" > stuff). That is to say, anyone who wants to be a moderator ought to be > disqualified from doing so (that goes for anyone who wants to control so you like to moderate me, being against moderation