From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 24 18:03:24 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537D916A46C
	for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:03:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wjw@digiware.nl)
Received: from mail.digiware.nl (www.tegenbosch28.nl [217.21.251.97])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4E113C461
	for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:03:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wjw@digiware.nl)
Received: from localhost (localhost.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFC41736D;
	Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:03:22 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at digiware.nl
Received: from mail.digiware.nl ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (rack1.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id UAXxw-BiLk-4; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:03:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [212.61.27.67] (opteron.digiware.nl [212.61.27.67])
	by mail.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F3417331;
	Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:03:17 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4798D2E2.4000809@digiware.nl>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:03:14 +0100
From: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl>
Organization: Digiware
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no>
References: <20080118.145436.-1540399028.imp@bsdimp.com>	<20080124114039.GF79134@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za>	<479880A7.1030107@digiware.nl>	<20080124.084828.1608359032.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<864pd386mj.fsf@ds4.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <864pd386mj.fsf@ds4.des.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: sshd broken on arm?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:03:24 -0000

Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
>> Actually, the above fix *IS* the correct fix for arm given the ABI
>> that we're using...
> 
> No.  The correct fix is one that will be acceptable to the upstream
> vendor, who has a different perspective on things than we do.

Well that was more what I would expect and both answers are hard.
Because it requires either:
  - the openSSH people to add something that is awkward to say the least.
  - get the compiler guys to do "the right thing", so now you have to 
convince them that they need to do a better analysis.

--WjW