From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 19:58:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329081065679; Mon, 7 May 2012 19:58:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FDE157105; Mon, 7 May 2012 19:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FA8296F.4070405@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 12:58:39 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120506 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Sergey Skvortsov , cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/p5-PerlIO-gzip Makefile ports/archivers/p5-PerlIO-via-Bzip2 Makefile ports/comms/p5-Device-SerialPort Makefile ports/converters/p5-Text-Iconv Makefile ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached-XS Makefile ports/databases/p5-C X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 19:58:43 -0000 On 05/07/2012 12:47, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 7 May 2012 20:15, "Doug Barton" > wrote: >> >> On 05/07/2012 08:42, Sergey Skvortsov wrote: >> > Pass maintainership of almost of my "p5-*" ports to "perl@". >> > >> > (I hope updating of them will be improved). >> >> Did you discuss this with anyone from perl@? The list should not be used >> as a dumping ground for unloved p5-* ports. It may have been better to >> pass these to ports@ instead. >> > > I'd rather have them in perl@ than ports@; it means anyone is allowed to > update them rather than messing with approval etc. Note that Sergey > didn't say he wouldn't update them again (or imply it IMO) I don't understand your answer. MAINTAINER= ports@ means that anyone can update them. Traditionally, MAINTAINER= perl@ means that a specific group of people have accepted responsibility for maintenance. If you're saying, as part of the perl@ team, that this policy has changed, so be it. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection