Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:55:56 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> To: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP multi processor compilations for everyone Message-ID: <7d6fde3d0903261155w3b9898a6me9f1aa4e8fc8bbac@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090326174632.GB19722@hades.panopticon> References: <1237901632.1849.19.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20090326174632.GB19722@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> wrote:
> * Pav Lucistnik (pav@FreeBSD.org) wrote:
>
> Btw, this change broke build failures. If vendor's make fails,
> .build_done.xxx._usr_local is still created in work and $? = 0 as if it
> have succeeded.
Another thing that may have failed to have been mentioned earlier:
if a python package uses easy_install, there's a potential for
corrupted data and missing install registries, so everything that uses
easy_install cannot be parallelized at this time. This is a bug in
easy_install that I need to provide a quick hack to fix upstream
because it's affecting my group at Cisco right now too.
Thanks,
-Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7d6fde3d0903261155w3b9898a6me9f1aa4e8fc8bbac>