From nobody Sun Nov 7 22:40:29 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D43E184BF18 for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 22:40:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from lax.lemis.com (www.lemis.com [45.32.70.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HnTjK75Xtz3sT6; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 22:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from eureka.lemis.com (unknown [121.200.11.253]) by lax.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2B427FF8; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 22:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eureka.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 843732635BE; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 09:40:29 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 09:40:29 +1100 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Michael Gmelin Cc: "Dan Mahoney (Ports)" , Daniel Engberg , Freebsd Ports Subject: Re: Regarding port(s) you maintain in FreeBSD ports collection Message-ID: <20211107224029.GB45416@eureka.lemis.com> References: <51D669ED-DF32-4EAE-B2CA-C3C14C0B9C29@grem.de> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51D669ED-DF32-4EAE-B2CA-C3C14C0B9C29@grem.de> Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-3-5309-0418 Mobile: +61-490-494-038. Use only as instructed. WWW-Home-Page: https://www.FreeBSD X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HnTjK75Xtz3sT6 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday, 7 November 2021 at 20:27:01 +0100, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> On 7. Nov 2021, at 20:06, Dan Mahoney (Ports) wrote: >>> On Nov 7, 2021, at 7:04 AM, Daniel Engberg wrote: >>> You're receiving this mail because you have one or more ports that >>> are affected by the change proposed in >>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32880 ... >> >> This caused me some headscratching (wait, is my port here but not >> in the list? Am I mailed because a port here is a dependency of my >> port?) > >> I???ve concluded that instead I???m receiving this mail because you >> sent it to the entire ports mailing list. Am I wrong? > > At least one of the affected ports is maintained by ports@ (=3Dunmaintain= ed). That makes it rather pointless to say "because you have one or more ports". Now *everybody* has to go through the list to find whether they're affected or not. It would have been better to exclude ports@ =66rom the list. But what I see is that really only ports@ was on the To: list. Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA.php --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAmGIVd0ACgkQIubykFB6QiPagQCcCcvmQU+4XGzpTX4bBq0Po+av lYYAnj9SlxZ3tdrPBMRdJXeWgEVebE1c =uJEL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC--