From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Feb 25  7:46:53 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 256F837B401; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 07:46:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4461043FB1; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 07:46:51 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27])
	by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h1PFknpG043816;
	Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:46:50 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030225104931.050a8d60@marble.sentex.ca>
X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:51:37 -0500
To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: OpenSSL 0.9.7 in -STABLE
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <20030225153907.GC96816@madman.celabo.org>
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030225102526.05852540@marble.sentex.ca>
 <5.2.0.9.0.20030224145408.05edb800@marble.sentex.ca>
 <20030214223844.GA96059@madman.celabo.org>
 <5.2.0.9.0.20030224145408.05edb800@marble.sentex.ca>
 <5.2.0.9.0.20030225102526.05852540@marble.sentex.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: By Sentex Communications (lava/20020517)
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-stable.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-stable>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-stable>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

At 09:39 AM 25/02/2003 -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
>So how is the total throughput?  Is it a win or a lose with the 7951?


Hard to tell as the boxes in question are all on 10BaseT full-duplex.  I 
could saturate them before and still can now.  But the load average on the 
server is far lower than before so I should be able to handle more clients 
at night when the backups run from the various machines.

         ---Mike 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message