From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Oct 17 13:01:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA17961 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Sat, 17 Oct 1998 13:01:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA17945; Sat, 17 Oct 1998 13:01:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id OAA06745; Sat, 17 Oct 1998 14:01:17 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.1.19981017135219.06f00520@mail.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@mail.lariat.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 13:55:29 -0600 To: sos@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Crash workaround: ATAPI and ATAPI_STATIC required in 2.2.7 wd driver Cc: bugs@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199810171949.VAA11529@sos.freebsd.dk> References: <4.1.19981017130810.06f04590@mail.lariat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id NAA17949 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 09:49 PM 10/17/98 +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote: >I just looked again (in -current though), and I cannot see how adding >the ATAPI* options should heal some disk problem. You didn't use >any atapi drives right ?? Nope, that WD drive is the only IDE device on the ENTIRE system. >> There's got to be some reason why the code is trying to access >> invalid addresses in one case but not the other.... > >Well, yes :) Well, I do see some code inside #ifdef ATAPI conditionals that seems to deal with buffers and/or IRQs. Could it be that this is the difference? (I'll send you the 2.2.7 wd.c if it's convenient.) --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message