From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Jul 21  6:33:38 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B6237B400
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 06:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B065643E31
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 06:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru)
Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6LDX9vm008419;
	Sun, 21 Jul 2002 17:33:22 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru)
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6LDX0XW008405;
	Sun, 21 Jul 2002 17:33:00 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from ache)
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 17:32:58 +0400
From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: suspend bug
Message-ID: <20020721133257.GA8289@nagual.pp.ru>
References: <20020721083307.GA6009@nagual.pp.ru> <20020721202537.U19918-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020721202537.U19918-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 20:30:14 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> 
> Er, there is no kernel bug here AFAIK.  

Where is the bug, then?

> I don't really understand rev.1.54
> of su.c.  Is it related to the PAM brokenness that is worked around in
> rev.1.53?

Rev 1.54 is not related to PAM (something about ^C), it fix suspend + fg.
I.e. for tcsh:

a) with 1.54 "suspend + fg" works, "stop $$ + fg" not works.
b) without 1.54 vice versa, "suspend + fg" not works, "stop $$ + fg" works

Where is the real bug?

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message