From owner-freebsd-net Fri Nov 16 17: 6:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from iguana.aciri.org (iguana.aciri.org [192.150.187.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125B437B418; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:06:38 -0800 (PST) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by iguana.aciri.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) id fAH12FO86173; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:02:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:02:15 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Julian Elischer Cc: Peter Wemm , Julian Elischer , current@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG, wollman@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: re-entrancy and the IP stack. Message-ID: <20011116170214.A86121@iguana.aciri.org> References: <20011116160458.B85435@iguana.aciri.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > so far there hasn't been a lot of suggestion as to how the goal can be > achieved however.. i actually suggested one i.e. have explicit pointers to metadata area(s) in the pkthdr. I think you forget the most fundamental feature which is performance. This is way more important than flexibility i think. > things it should be: > > 1/ flexible > 2/ queueable > 3/ transparent to 3rd party code that doesn't know about it. cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message