From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 10:35:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7936106566B for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DD38FC14 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so4477698bkv.13 for ; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 03:35:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2vDyxeZv2ltlGPBj6oQJ65Licgsm45QzgVThAV8inCc=; b=rBTwfvZjvd4Dl/IyQ0PfeSY14kd9cMXMg8SUpHPgzuRMRyB8lYmELbnoybKFtQZvZv MfRY5P/CEgtb3zmpdOvqSfc5ZnjsO9QFNOBLDFnbRPmZ3IiRucC094R8CMflIxXw92fh O/7TiUtWqocVEDGmjlK+rkK89OamVr5uqOFbOdAy8laq21uXGLBQ8EQZFpOe12ecvJ0J /0ZkamffVLiaepqQ6hRdFyQ79Kprvw1WKnERO6SwpUxcETiyJYnjnBw49Qoqrmi2EbDl 4me+es+4cUq+KKSOeRUlS5TJpX/fwN8ofNKQsAz7mWlKHxXOb/nAS3A+hbQXNP8ea6Gm nGJw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.145.89 with SMTP id c25mr6532731bkv.5.1338806113188; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 03:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 03:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 03:35:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> References: <201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120602004230.GA14487@in-addr.com> <201206040224.q542OBqk085897@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com> <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 11:35:13 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Dave Hayes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Mark Linimon , FreeBSD Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:35:14 -0000 On Jun 4, 2012 9:50 AM, "Dave Hayes" wrote: > > Mark Linimon writes: > > On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 07:24:11PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote: > >> I see features and pkgng and things being offered up as solutions... > >> these are all well and good, but in my opinion more comprehensive > >> documentation and support in these areas would do more good than pkgng. > > IMHO pkgng and optionsng are necessary, but not sufficient, to solve > > our current problems. > > Optionsng is nice, but lacking in documentation. Is it too much to ask > port maintainers to write a bit more documentation on the options they > are providing? Where are you looking? I updated the Porter's Handbook- is there something missing? Chris