From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Mar  9 18:47:23 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA02302 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 18:47:23 -0800
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA02296 for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 18:47:22 -0800
Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id SAA01682; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 18:47:10 -0800
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199503100247.SAA01682@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: SNAP or current?
To: tom@haven.uniserve.com (Tom Samplonius)
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 18:47:10 -0800 (PST)
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950309180146.771A-100000@haven.uniserve.com> from "Tom Samplonius" at Mar 9, 95 06:10:12 pm
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 289       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>   Which is more stable right now:  the latest SNAP, or current?

current is pretty good just now I think.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent'
=> 'no rude people are relevant'