Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 10:27:45 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@lansing.dk> To: RJ45 <rj45@slacknet.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adaptec 2100s or 5400s ?? Message-ID: <20020527102745.G7806@mail.droso.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0205270219350.27453-100000@slacknet.slacknet.com>; from rj45@slacknet.com on Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:21:50AM -0600 References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0205270219350.27453-100000@slacknet.slacknet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--hwvH6HDNit2nSK4j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:21:50AM -0600, RJ45 wrote: >=20 > Hello, > I wanted to ask if Adaptec 2100s is well supported by FreeBSD or not. > I have to buy a mail server with RAID capability. > I have seen Adaptec 5400s is supported by FreeBSD but it is a high > profile and high cost product not affordable for me. > I have searched around without success I only found out 5400s is well > supported but I do not know if 2100s is, and I Am interested to know it. > thank you very much >=20 We've been running a couple of 2100s in production for some time without any trouble. asr0: <Adaptec Caching SCSI RAID> mem 0xf4000000-0xf5ffffff irq 11 at device 8.1 on pci1 asr0: major=3D154 asr0: ADAPTEC 2100S FW Rev. 320R, 1 channel, 256 CCBs, Protocol I2O /erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing -- http://droso.org --hwvH6HDNit2nSK4j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE88e4Bqy9aWxUlaZARAhHcAJ9kw8dFsZZNJAOHLcxon13byPdp8QCeNLcQ /YHMW6LXQ9akCbBoBnxHaKI= =sPmw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hwvH6HDNit2nSK4j-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020527102745.G7806>