Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:52:13 +0200
From:      Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
To:        Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com>
Cc:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: calcru: runtime went backwards
Message-ID:  <20060215185213.GA24331@flame.pc>
In-Reply-To: <c21e92e20602150959p148290b3y5eb7189b8aaf019d@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20060212225911.M598@free.home.local> <30864.1139781541@critter.freebsd.dk> <c21e92e20602150959p148290b3y5eb7189b8aaf019d@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006-02-16 01:59, Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com> wrote:
> I still get calcru messages from kernel built with sources 2 hours ago
> cvsupped via cvsup12. When the system is under load, sshd and inetd
> can get these messages and stop responding to any requests. As the
> machine is at a remote site, my original idea was to keep sshd and
> inetd/telnetd running, so that when sshd freezes, I can telnet into
> the machine and restart sshd (from a security point of view, this is a
> bad thing, I know). But to my surprise, after sshd froze, telnetd
> won't respond either. Connection was built successfully but no login
> prompt appeared. At this time, any CGI script that httpd invokes will
> not run. Could this possibly be some problem with the pts code instead
> of the accounting code?

Check with top(1), if you have access to the local machine for the
amount of time spent in `interrupt' handling.  I've seen some very high
interrupt loads with some of the recent kernels, but I'm not sure why
yet.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060215185213.GA24331>