From owner-cvs-all Tue Feb 22 9:14: 3 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from prince.net.ebina.hitachi.co.jp (sagami134136.allnet.ne.jp [210.251.134.136]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABC937B64E; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 09:13:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp) Received: from ebina.hitachi.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prince.net.ebina.hitachi.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with SMTP id CAA40452; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 02:13:42 +0900 (JST) From: sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp Message-Id: <200002221713.CAA40452@prince.net.ebina.hitachi.co.jp> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 02:13:41 +0900 (JST) To: asami@FreeBSD.org Cc: sumikawa@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Cc: sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/apache13+ipv6 - Imported sources In-Reply-To: References: <200002201654.IAA24863@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: xcite1.31> Mew version 1.95b10 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk asami> * sumikawa 2000/02/20 08:54:07 PST asami> * apache13 with IPv6 supporting. asami> Um, repository copy? ;) Very sorry, I considered that repositry copy was not need in this case. Repositry copy is necessary in the case of version-updated port such as qt because we will shift to use new port and will remove old one. But apach13+ipv6 will be removed when IPv6 patches are merged in the original distribution. (itojun works to merge it on apache-2.0 tree.) I considered that we didn't need the history for this port. Should I do any fixing? Or do you approve my careless importing? --- Munechika SUMIKAWA @ KAME Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message