From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 4 18:18:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138E416A41C for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 18:18:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net [83.136.81.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCCC43D46 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 18:18:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: (qmail 2420 invoked by uid 89); 4 Jul 2005 18:18:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kartoffel.salatschuessel.net) (83.136.81.185) by avocado.salatschuessel.net with SMTP; 4 Jul 2005 18:18:33 -0000 Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 20:18:37 +0200 From: Oliver Lehmann To: Hugo Silva Message-Id: <20050704201837.39b739fc.lehmann@ans-netz.de> In-Reply-To: <42C97C59.8050609@celeritystorm.com> References: <20050704.141257.104030539.chat95@mac.com> <42C97C59.8050609@celeritystorm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta4 (GTK+ 2.6.8; amd64-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: better optimization flags for opteron (amd64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 18:18:46 -0000 Hugo Silva wrote: > Hmm, would this be safe to use on all ports? Sometimes speed is nice, > but if it breaks stability... Not for mozilla(-devel) at least... if you try this, you'll get a funny looking but unuseable mozilla - at least I do ;) -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/