From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 7 07:42:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAAC16A41F for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 07:42:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F0543D46 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 07:42:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (qxabuf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j977gEgg099724; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:42:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j977gEqi099723; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:42:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:42:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200510070742.j977gEqi099723@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, Donatas In-Reply-To: <020201c5cafc$3806b460$9f90a8c0@donatas> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-net User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-RELEASE (i386)) Cc: Subject: Re: double tagged vlans on 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, Donatas List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:42:18 -0000 Donatas wrote: > Just wonder - what is the major reason double vlan support (also known as q-in-q > or nested vlan) is still not included in freebsd. It is supported, for years already (even in FreeBSD 4.x). See ng_vlan(4). You can even do q-in-q-in-q if you want (do Cisco etc. support that?). ;-) Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "What is this talk of 'release'? We do not make software 'releases'. Our software 'escapes', leaving a bloody trail of designers and quality assurance people in its wake."